The Credit Crunch
In a book I wrote 'Faith - The Shattered Dream' I predicted the current bank crash. Not the exact date nor did I call it the Credit Crunch which is the name it has been given in Britain but I predicted the economic crisis and I'm fairly sure I predicted that it would be caused deliberately but if I didn't I'm saying it now.
If you read the sections on economics and Paradise Earth you will discover these predictions. I am not a prophet so this wasn't a revelation, it was a calculation, it had to happen because the leaders of the world need an occasional crisis to keep the Working Classes in their place. I said it was caused deliberately so you need an explanation; how and by whom?
Queen Elizabeth of England once said to one of the late Princess Diana's shoe shiners ( I know that is pejorative language which I wouldn't use if he hadn't gone on to show how honoured he was to be a shoe shiner to the parasites) , 'There are forces at work about which we know nothing.' This comment was reported world wide by the media. It's a pity the Queen doesn't know who they are because she and her monarchy are its puppets. David Icke who has been branded a crank partly because of his attempts to unmask these people says they are the Bilderberg group and in so doing he is very warm but he has not hit the nail on the head because as far as I know he has been unable to name the actual Bilderberg members who hold the reins of power. You see not all Bilderberg members rule the world. Those that do (and those that do not are unaware that these people are among them) are members of the Bilderberg group for the sole purpose of spying and manipulation on behalf of the world leaders. There are some very high up in the Mason's also operating incognito.
The first bank to hit the skids in Britain was the Northern Rock, the bank a friend of mine has his mortgage with. (It wasn't a friend of mine it was me but I've moved now so I'm not afraid to admit it - the banks have, or at least one bank Barclays played a very significant part in destroying me in the past that's why I was initially reluctant to admit it was me. - One week after it went down the chute and with its customers queueing around the block to withdraw their savings a letter dropped through his door from Northern Rock asking if he would like to liquidate some of the equity in his house. They were offering him and presumably hundreds, perhaps thousands, of others loans when according to the media they were broke. Why was this do you think? It was because they weren't broke, the banks precarious predicament was a lie, the whole crisis is a barrage of lies like the lies told on a daily basis by every Prime Minister and their cabinet colleagues since there ever was a Prime Minister.
'There's not enough money for the National Health Service, the Department of Education, the Roads department, old people's winter fuel allowances and their pensions.' If you are British living in the UK and keeping up on a daily basis with the news, you will recognise that political information fed constantly to the gullible and not so gullible public by glib tongued politicians. Then, with his faithful Indian companion Tonto, Prime Minister Gordon Brown, the current British Prime Minister magicked up £500 billion (on the radio this morning I heard the figure £2trillion that's 2 and 12 zeros or two million million pounds.) from thin air. No, they are not and never can be short of money, as I said on my website and other places (published) years ago it comes from an infinite supply available to any government.
'If we introduce too much money into the economy it will cause inflation and certain economic disaster.' Where have you heard that one before? Yesterday, again on the radio I heard that the Zimbabwe inflation rate was running at 231 million percent. I'm not advising anyone to adopt the Zimbabwe method of doing things I'm just pointing out that Zimbabwe still has an economy. I was asking where you'd heard that one before and one answer is the London School of economics. The L.S. E. issue degrees to fool people into believing that economics is a science, it is not.
Why is it that introducing money into the economy is anathema for anything other than war and propping up the banking system? I need you to understand that I am not just making this up to suit the occasion so I won't answer that question, go to my website and discover for yourself that I have been saying what I am saying here for years. What I will tell you though is how the current 'crisis' (intentionally inflicted) happened. Yeah, you are right, this is my website which means I wrote this somewhere before and can't remember where, then I lifted verbatim and planted it here.
Within the past year, on the orders of 'They who must be obeyed' the price of a barrel of oil shot up by an unprecedented amount. Bear in mind at this point that the largest share of God's oil reserves have been stolen by a few Arabs who support a religion that cuts the hands off paupers for stealing a loaf of bread. This huge increase in the oil price had exactly the effect that 'They who must be obeyed' intended it to have. Prices at the pumps shot up. Here in England £1.21 per litre, that's roughly twice the price that it was selling at in the States where they guzzle 25% of world supply and whine even more than we do at the price. As a result of this oil price rise there was a resultant increase in the cost of domestic fuel, 49% for gas and 29% on the price of electricity and of course food prices went up to compensate. I say compensate but its just a euphemism for any excuse. Daily the radio here announces a figure of around 5% inflation, where they get that figure from I don't know but if the figure is intended to cover annual inflation then it is a blue lie. The inflation rate in Britain has gone up at least 10% in the past year.
So you ask yourself, why did 'They who must be obeyed' order the oil price to be increased so precipitously, didn't they know it would have a domino effect? The answer is, 'They who must be obeyed' ordered the price hike precisely because they knew it would cause a domino effect, they knew the banking system without government intervention would collapse, they knew the Stock Market would be rocked they knew the entire world economy would panic itself into crisis. That's why they did it and the plan worked like a dream.
Why? That's the sixty four thousand dollar question ( + a bit inflation) yet despite all those degrees that the London School of Economics dishes out, nobody has uttered a syllable of explanation that would suggest they have the faintest idea what is going on. So let the Messiah explain:
The inflation rate in Zimbabwe is running at 231 million%, its a figure that boggles the mind, how they work it out I shall never know since it looks to me that the figure will change by a few thousand percent while you do the calculation. No doubt the people who reported this figure have taken a little poetic licence with it but licence or not there is no denying the fact that the Zimbabwe economy is in shambles and the reason can be put down to one man President Robert Mugabe. I don't suppose there's anyone in the world other than his own cronies who doubts that Mugabe is to blame yet he is after 30 years of catastrophic mismanagement still in power and the world stands by and does nothing on the pretext that they don't want to 'interfere in the domestic affairs of a sovereign country,' don't laugh.
I am not suggesting that a bullet between the eyes should be the solution to this problem but let's admit it, for 'They who must be obeyed' there are far more drastic actions taken on their behalf for which they lose not a wink of sleep. Why then haven't they done it and by so doing saved the lives of many Zimbabwe peasants? The reason is because they are happy with the way Mugabe mismanages his country as they were happy with Mobuto of Zaire and a list of other despots, absolute crooks, who are allowed to hold the power of life and death over millions of people. We'll come back, now let's take a look at those banks' lending policies.
You apply to bank A for a £200,000 mortgage, they give you a cheque which you pass on to the vendor and he deposits it in bank B. Your brother takes out a mortgage of let's say the same amount given to him in the form of a cheque which he gives to his vendor who deposits it in bank A. Where's the money? There isn't any, there were just two pieces of paper both of which will be strategically deposited in a shredder after the banks make an entry in their ledgers. You have your house, your brother has his house and the vendors you bought them from are each the proud owners of an entry on a ledger sheet.
Now you are going to say, 'But' and of course you are right, 'the people whose numbers are on the ledger sheet will eventually take their money out and use it.' Sure they will but note that little word 'eventually' because until they do the bank has the use of that money. What money, they were just two bits of paper?
You see, the banks don't just make money out of money they make it, indeed most of their profits, out of the illusion of money and what they have been doing is criminal, tantamount to forgery on a massive scale. Here's how it works. You borrow money from the banks for which they charge interest and you spend it. The shop or whatever at which you spend it puts it back in the bank and they lend it to someone else and charge interest. It may not go back into the same bank? Doesn't matter, all the money in circulation ends up in one or other of the banks so they have all of the money except that which is being used in cash by people on any particular day. The money that goes out in cash one day comes in as deposits the next day. 'They can't lend money that they don't have' Ha! 'They can only lend money equivalent to their paid up capital plus their customers deposits and investments' Ha! Don't be so naïve.
The cost of housing has rocketed in Britain by 400% in the past 10 years. Now do the maths. A year or so ago, I read in a newspaper that the average person in Britain is in hock to the tune of £30,000 not counting their mortgages. All right, you can't believe everything you read in the newspapers so let's assume the report was mistaken by £30,000, that still means the average person, not counting mortgages, is potless. Which means that the money in the banks that they have been lending is not the people's savings. Also bear in mind that the government will not print money unless it absolutely has to because 'printing money causes inflation' (an urban myth, mismanagement causes inflation) and every government in the world is in debt to the tune of any figure you can think of, meaning they pay money out of your taxes to the banks for the interest on the loans they take out on your behalf. So where, pray tell me, did all the money the banks have been lending and are still lending, come from – trillions scrillions fillions swindlions of it? That's right, there isn't, wasn't, does not need to be any, it is just illusion.
A cheque is legal currency, when you write one it legally becomes currency providing you have the funds in the bank to cover it, likewise the cheques that the banks issue are legal currency providing they have the cash to back them up which they haven't meaning they are illegal currency another word for which is forgeries the kind of document for which the likes of you and I are sent to prison for long periods – not so the world's greatest criminals. That's not hyperbole, the world's greatest criminals by far, never spend any time in prison, indeed the biggest crooks in the British world steal more money than have all the inmates of all the prisons in Britain put together. That they are never brought to book is because for centuries they have written the laws to allow them to steal money legally, lawyers steal their clients money because the laws which their buddies make in parliament allow them to charge fees that are nothing short of theft. You can call it what you like and I'll bet a weeks wages the lawyers can think of a hundred excuses to justify it but the truth is the laws are made to allow they who produce no wealth to steal from those who produce it all, the parasites from the Working Classes. And the judges are up to the eyes in this dishonesty. What justice is there for people who can't afford lawyers? They have the nerve to sit inside courts that have a statue of a lady outside blindfolded with a pair of scales in her hand thereby implying that justice is blind and fair, they choose to ignore the fact that there is a fat cat lawyer on one side of the scales, because if they demanded total fairness they wouldn't get their unfair and undeserved salaries. There is no such thing as an honest judge, if there were he would have to resign on the principle that the legal system is grossly unfair. Sorry I got carried away, I hate judges, scumbags.
The actual cost of building a house in Britain is only about 20% of what they are being sold for, (this is Capitalism the driving force of which, according to the parasites and the gullible is market forces) the Working People build them, make all the materials that go into them, maintain them sustain them and then pay the parasites for the privilege of living in them. I keep wandering don't I?
Back to the banks. The only money that the banks need in cash is the amount that goes in and out on a daily basis, a small fraction of the money that, theoretically, is in circulation, what am I saying; theoretically? It is in circulation it's just not legal, moral or honest, substantially it is just figures on a balance sheet – illusion. Why then you may ask, if the banks have access to an infinite amount of money do they pay interest on their depositors money that they don't need? Why then did the Northern Rock bank and a few other banks with them crash until the government bailed them out? Doesn't make sense does it? Why were the top executives of these banks sacked, ostensibly for presiding over the banks when they crashed and paid millions of pounds in bonuses severance benefits and pensions? The chief executive of the Bank of Scotland'resigned' with a £500,000-a-year-for-life pension and the £8million bonus he paid himself the previous year. He even had the audacity to say that he would not take the two million or so bonus that he was entitled to for year 2008, brings tears to your eyes doesn't it? What a man, the heart bleeds. My dad lost a brother in the Second World War, aged 19, my mum lost her brother and only sibling aged 22 my grandparents got zilch. And what did these top executives do other than sit on their bums all day and drink coffee? Tell me when you've figured it out. Doesn't make sense does it?
So let me explain. The banks in Britain have been making about 3% profit which is the difference between the money loaned to the banks by depositors, mostly money paid to them for the sales of their house and the money they have loaned as mortgages, trillions of pounds for money that doesn't exist. How then could Northern Rock and the Bank of Scotland run out of money if they have an infinite amount forged simply by writing figures on cheques? The answer is because they ran out of cash for their day to day transactions. Somebody set off a rumour, it was 'They who must be obeyed', that Northern Rock was going under so their depositors panicked and rushed to the bank to withdraw their hard earned savings.
This cash shortage generally wouldn't have caused any problems because the customers who took their money out would have simply put it in another bank that they thought was safer and those banks would have loaded it into security vans at the back door and sent it straight back to Northern Rock. When Northern Rock customers saw that the Rock was not running out of money they would have brought theirs back. You see the cash needed for every day business and domestic transactions doesn't change much on a daily basis whether there is a run on a bank or not so whenever, hardly ever, there is such a situation there is an unwritten law between banks that they will help each other out with cash until the panic dies down. Why then did the Northern Rock bank have to go to the government for help? And here's the answer.
The oil price was hiked so precipitously that it took the banks by surprise. There was a 10% increase in the cost of living which resulted in a need for 10% more by the banks. Now try to imagine a 10% across the board shortfall that would add up to trillions of pounds dollars whatever currency you name and the top bank executives knew this, how could they not?
Northern Rock had a run so as would be normal practice they rang their fellow crooks at the other banks and asked for help with cash but this time the other banks refused to send them any, why?
Because they knew that there was a general shortage of 10% , 5% please yourself a shortfall in cash for day to day transactions is a shortfall whether 10 or 5% the outcome would eventually be the same which would be an inevitable crash of the banking system without the governments' help. Some banks, the ones holding the baby, would end up with egg on their faces and heads would inevitably roll so they held on to what cash they had and left Northern Rock, Bank of Scotland, Freddie Mac and Fanny Mae among them to take the flak. Heads rolled, big payouts to the executives who were sacrificed, why? Hush money, they knew that the swindle was going on and they know the names of the people giving the orders so they had to be silenced.
What's the next question going through your mind? Don't tell me, let me guess. Why did 'They who must be obeyed' set off the chain reaction of events (oil price hikes) that would inevitably lead to a world-wide economic crisis and a recession (today it was announced that Britain is officially in a recession) that would threaten their own banks. Right?
Ask yourself this; why do people want to be rich? It's because those people who have money are free, free from the drudgery of every day living. Rich people don't get up in the mornings and go to work unless they choose to, unless their 'job' is something they like doing. If every one in the world was rich there would be nobody to do the work. Ergo, 'They who must be obeyed' take it upon themselves on behalf of common sense and the world economy to see that some people – most of us – remain poor. There is only one proviso for this public service; they and theirs must not be included.
News gets around, there is a run on the Northern Bank, they admit that they are in trouble, what happens to their share price? If the bank goes under the shares will be worthless – panic. Price drops. Working Class people who have managed to buy a few shares with their life savings can't afford to lose everything so they sell at a loss. Who buys dodgy shares? 'They who must be obeyed' parasites.
Then lo and behold, would you believe, the government steps in to save the situation because 'We can't afford to let the banking system collapse' share prices rise again. The government demands shares for the money they are investing (billions of pounds in the case of Northern Rock). No problem 'They who must be obeyed' are only too happy to sell them shares at a price that reflects the value of the difference between all the money the bank is owed on mortgages and the investors money that doesn't and never did exist – until now when the government pays out in legal currency.
Since the government saved Northern Rock from collapse the same bank has been re-possessing homes at a record pace, indeed since all this nonsense started almost 300,000 homes have been re-possessed in Britain. Men women and children put out of their homes by scum of the earth bailiffs under orders from criminal judges who are in the pay of a government that dances to the tune of parisitocracy and 'They who must be obeyed'. And with all that money invested by the various governments the banks still haven't started lending again the drop in interest rates have been ignored by the lending institutions and the banks are still repossessing the houses, companies are going broke. Doesn't make sense does it? Until you understand the reasoning behind recessions which is to impoverish the working classes.
Today 21st of October 2008 the Institute (or something) of manufacturers issued a statement that business and the economy has not been so bad for 28 years. This statement is a precursor to job losses and more people losing their homes. Who do you think will buy those homes that will be sold at auction for give away prices? It won't be working class people because they don't have any money and many don't have and won't be able to find jobs. We know somebody that has money though don't we, because they sold their shares and with that money they will buy houses in the housing market that has collapsed and in shares, which will also inevitably collapse, when the money introduced into the economy causes further inflation and the balance of the money that one way or another the parasites will end up with will go back into their banks. Whose banks? Didn't the government buy them out? Well, not quite, you see politicians who with their infinite wisdom found an answer to the problem of the banking crisis, a solution which it just so happens is the same and only one they have for solving all problems i.e. throwing money at it 'don't understand the banking business' their own words, so they quite sensibly (surely you understand that?) invited the people who do know, bankers, to do it. Where are the bankers? Ehhhhh, in the banks, the same guys who've caused the banking crisis by forging their own currency, crooks, bit like employing arsonists to run the fire station. Never mind, such is the fact, that's what they have done.
Another point worth mentioning is the interest rate increase which resulted from the oil price increase that set off the domino effect which the government used to panic the nation with their usual bulldust rhetoric about all the problems of the Universe being caused by inflation. Solution? You'll never guess the solution our brilliant politicians came up with, go on have a guess. What? Put the interest rates up? How did you know? It's been done before? Every year since the time of Solomon. You mean Gordon Brown the world's saviour didn't think that one up himself. Yes, I'm having a laugh, you could train monkeys...... When I first wrote this paragraph, such was the talk at the bank of England and among those omniscient people who advise journalists (where do they come from?) about the solution to the Credit Crunch, luckily even they are not that stupid, the interest rates have come down far enough for everybody to recognise the smart move. Pity no one takes any notice, the banks are refusing to lend and the unofficial rates which they make themselves have just ignored the rate change.
Tell me this; By what right do the parasites solve the problems of inflation (which hurts people in a way that is directly proportional to the amount of money they have) by stealing from Working Class people who have a house? What would you say if the baker from whom you bought a loaf of bread yesterday knocked on your door and said, 'You know that bread you bought from me yesterday, I've had to put the price up this morning because of inflation. You owe me ten pence.' You'd laugh in his face wouldn't you, the idea is ridiculous. Yet that's exactly what happens with mortgages and the housing market.
I wonder how many people know what's going on when the interest rate is increased? I'll bet most people think the government gets the extra money that is paid on their mortgages and it is paid into the national coffers, after all isn't it the Bank of England, the government's bank, that puts the interest rates up? And wasn't it that crook Tony Blair, now multi millionaire (erstwhile Socialist Prime Minister) who handed the job of interest rate hiking to the Bank of England so that he and his party wouldn't be blamed at the polls for all the shenanigans of interest rate hiking? And didn't this transfer of power to the Bank of England create in the minds of gullible people the idea that interest rates and inflation result from the 'science' (pseudo) of economics, ergo 'It doesn't matter who puts the interest rates up, putting interest rates up is essential and inevitable so why not leave it to the pros?'
Let me explain what happens to the extra money paid over to the banks when there is an interest rate hike and what the consequences are. You pay your mortgage to the bank and the interest goes to the ehhhh let me think..... oh yes, I've got it; to the banks, every last penny, increases and all. And who is the bank? Shareholders. Listen to this: Margaret Thatcher (spit) sold the nations utility companies, railways and everything she could get her hands on meaning everything belonging to the British people, to 'private investors' She said she wanted 'the people to participate in the ownership of ......' Liar! If you doubt that Margaret Thatcher is a liar and a bitch from hell go to any Working Class area of Britain and spend an hour or two knocking doors. Ask at each door how many shares they have. No, the liar, she used that excuse to sell the family furniture and possessions to those British people who have the money to buy it, the parasites. And the parasites still own the shares while the working people - going daily to their jobs creating the true wealth that the parasites cream off with the illusionary wealth of money - are up to their necks in debt or out on the streets having had their houses re-possessed. Where was I?
Yes the money from your mortgage payments, all of it, including interest, including interest rises, including charges for all kinds of fictitious costs goes 100% to the banks and their shareholder. Now pay attention because this is important:
Why does the (now) Bank of England Governor increase the interest rates ( which incidentally the banks are not compelled to adhere to and they don't, they always charge more and blame increases on the 'base rate' meaning the government.)? He does it to 'bring down inflation.' And how does putting up interest rates bring down inflation? Well, common sense really, if you don't have money to buy something you can't buy it, so if the bank increases interest rates the amount of money available to the working people decreases by the extra amount that they have to pay to the banks for their mortgages so the manufacturers and the farmers must reduce the cost of their produce in order to sell it, sometimes at a price lower than it costs to produce. When the farmers and manufacturers lose money, they go out of business and or have to lay off workers, so the workers with no jobs become poorer which is the intention of 'They who must be obeyed' as I said earlier.
Now think about this: The government hasn't taken the extra mortgage money from the banks and burnt it, which means that it is still there within the economy some of it admittedly having gone to pay tax in order to perpetuate the illusion that the government needs it (I am not suggesting that the government should scrap the tax system and print its own money, my ideas are far more radical than that.) And the government hasn't taken all of the money so where is the rest. It must be in the hands of the people, there is nowhere else it could be. But the average Briton is in debt, heavily to the tune of thousands of pounds, millions of them, so they don't have it. Who then has the money? That's right, they who are not the average, the parasites.
The government (although it would have us believe it was the bank of England) put the interest rate up to bring down inflation which hurt who the most? They who have most money. In effect what the government does when it ups the interest rate is nothing less than steal true wealth from they who produce it, the Working Classes and what does the government do with the spoils, booty, swag?
They give it to the parasites.
Do you know who was the world's most dangerous woman of all time? Margaret Thatcher (spit) not just because she was stupid beyond measure but because she had the luck of circumstances that made her seem like a gift from the gods to they who benefited from her stupidity, and there were many, unfortunately, for every one that benefited many suffered and died. The damage that woman caused will live on for generations. The luck that she had was; the Falklands War that she took credit for winning, North Sea Gas that financed her stupidity and fellow politicians with glib tongues who were even more stupid (or just crooks) than she. I met her at the residence of the British High Commissioner in Lusaka during the Commonwealth heads of State Conference in 1978ish. She was at that same time showing that uppity colonial whipper snapper Ian Smith who was boss. Wouldn't be told, she knew it all. Apart from the destruction of Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) she is also responsible for the collapse of British Shipbuilding, the car manufacturing industry, the coal industry, the regression of the British manufacturing industry to name but a few of her one woman disasters and what for? To replace them all with paper shuffling wealth-illusion.
It was the North Sea Gas that came on tap just when she came to power that helped her to get away with it. She divided the British Working Class people against themselves (the ones who were taken in by the idea that they had never had it so good because she sold them their own houses and they who knew they had just been conned.) She destroyed the power of the Trade Unions and she replaced the Labour Party with Conservatives calling them New Labour. She didn't even pretend that she hadn't done it. When kicked out of office by her own people who belatedly realised how dangerous she was, she responded to a journalist who asked, 'What do you think was your greatest achievement Mrs Thatcher?' with not a flicker of hesitation; 'New Labour'.
Again on radio this morning there was a typical example of the parasites divide and rule tactics,
'If we didn't live beyond our means' the working class man said, 'buying houses we can't afford with money they should never have been loaned by the banks'. Go ahead, blame the working man for his own problems when he is just trying to put a roof over his family's head. Whose fault is it that the houses are so expensive, do you know that if you take all the tax, lawyers costs, unfair profit out of the 'market', houses would be selling at 20% of the current rate? People making huge profits in the money markets may be dealing in fictitious wealth but that fictitious wealth allows them to buy real wealth which must be created, from where does it come? From the pockets of they that created it, legal theft, that's what it is, have I said that already? Well it needs saying over and over again until you working class people who include those stupid people who have been deluded by the parasites (divide and rule) into believing they are middle class and therefore better, get it into your heads that you are being taken for a ride and make up your minds to do something about it.
Another working man on the radio a few days back, 'The economic crisis is caused by all the spongers who won't work or claim money for sick pay from the government.' Again divide and rule, that chap should try unemployment for a while and find out for himself how difficult it is to extract money from the government. On losing ones job and attending the Job Centre hoping for unemployment benefits, providing you didn't resign your previous job where you will receive nothing, the money you will receive is about £60 a week, paid from the money you and everyone else in employment pays in national insurance contributions. To qualify for this unemployment benefit you must prove that you are actively looking for work. The Queen who does a job that takes no talent or qualifications, a job that anybody could do, receives £15million per year from the government civil list and another £15mill from the Duchy of Lancaster. All of her family receive money from the same list for doing less than the average bin man does. I apologise if I offend any bin men who are far more respectable, hard working and useful members of society.
The Queen's son Charles receives £15mill per year from the Duchy of Cornwall. And before anybody says, 'The Queen has to pay for the upkeep of this that and the other' let me point out that she has personal wealth of £2billion left over from her this that and the other which allows her to steal whatever she wants from me and the people I love – the working classes.
One last anecdote; you know that story doing the rounds, again since the time of King Solomon, the one about 'Well they have to do it, look how many jobs it creates and how much income it makes for the government – taxes.' How stupid must one be to believe there is any merit in that observation?
What's the point of creating jobs for the purpose of tax revenue? You give a man a job shuffling papers that serves no useful purpose, then you employ people to mint the money that you pay him with accountants to count it, clerks and typists to record it, tax men to take it off him again.
'At least the man will have a job and will be able to feed his kids'
If that's what the government cares about (ours doesn't) why not just give him the things he needs and stop wasting his time his labour the materials used in building the office he works in, the machines and equipment he may use, the fuel that takes him to work and the same for the accountant the clerk typist and tax collector then they could be employed doing something useful like creating wealth or in the service industry?
This example is in the economics section also but worth repeating.
Let's take for example the dirty business of the tobacco industry as a quintessential example of what I am talking about. And I am not having a go at the smokers, it's not their fault that the parasites turned them into addicts, when the revolution comes we'll give you cigarettes for nothing if you insist on killing yourselves. As a stark example of how stupid the monetary system is think about this: You take a piece of land on which you could grow food, you plough it, you till it, you fertilize it, using valuable machinery equipment and labour then you plant your crop, tobacco. While it is growing you apply top dressing fertilizer, weed it regularly and spray chemicals on it to kill off all the bugs then when it is fully grown you harvest it and put it in barns to be dried. Then you send it to auction where you get ripped off by unscrupulous buyers. From there the money you have paid goes into your bank where some of it will be taken to pay off your loan and your farm will be taken if you fail to pay, the bank will employ people to count it, lend it, register it, etc it and the tabacco will be taken to a factory where people are employed to cut it, mash it, roll it pack it and transport it using vehicles and fuel to shops where people will be paid to sell it for money that is taken to the bank to be ...... The person who buys the cigarettes then takes one out puts it in his mouth and , would you believe sets fire to it. You then have the two fs one at either end of the cigarette a fire and a fool, the said fool inhales the smoke and contaminates his lungs arteries blood bones organs limbs skin and the atmosphere. Having done this he inevitably makes himself ill so he needs a doctor who will give him medicine having had his time wasted, from there and after some years of foolish behaviour he will need the services of a hospital, doctors nurses more medicine a bed equipment and food. Do you get the point? And some darned idiot of a politician will tell you that it creates jobs, bit like warming the house up by setting the furniture on fire don't you think?
One last point. In the great United States of America there is an election campaign going on, the candidates are Obama and McCain. Yesterday a lady asked why she was backing Obama replied, 'Well he is so good looking, he is tall he is young and he is an excellent speaker.' In order to compete with this obvious array of talents what did McCain do? Got himself a dolly bird as his running mate. Does it not frighten you? Can people not see that the democratic process is used against the people by 'They who must be obeyed'? Would you get on an aeroplane piloted by one of the passengers chosen by the democratic process? Crazy idea isn't it? Yet that's how we choose our leaders. No wonder the world is in such a mess. Have I any better ideas? What do you think? www.messianiclaw.com
During the past week or so the petrol prices at the pumps started to come down because people hit by the crisis were staying at home and not buying so much gas. What did the 'Opec ministers' do?
Reduced the oil production by 1.5 million barrels a day to get the prices up again. Have you any idea how many people in the Third World, (those at the end of the line) will die because of these people's decisions. And despite the introduction of so much money into the banks they are still not lending – you know why don't you. All of the world's financial and social problems have their roots in the Messianic Law. Study it and you will understand everything.