Paradise Earth I

Paradise Earth III

Paradise Earth IV

Paradise Earth II

‘God will punish…’ No He won’t, why should He? That’s just the rhetoric of Religious Institutionism and it uses fear of God for reasons of self interest, in order to control, to empower; itself.

The Poor are too tired from the effort of staying alive to even contemplate the possibility or ‘rectifying’ the situation, not that they could rectify it anyway because they don’t know what the cause of the problem is, so invariably they surrender themselves to Religious Institutionism not because it has the solution but because it gives them the only hope on offer.

Is it false hope? What does it matter? Hope and false hope have the same effect on people who are desperate. According to the Messianic Law when the human brain calculates that it cannot achieve happiness and the pursuit of it merely causes more sadness it will stop the pursuit,. it must, it will commit suicide, it must. Fear is all that stands in the way of most people on the planet committing suicide because for them life is not worth living, but the pain of fear outweighs the pain of hunger and disease. That’s what keeps them alive. You don’t agree?

I remember being taught as a boy (by whom I don’t remember, perhaps it was the same teacher who taught me that Everest is in Tibet ) that survival is man’s basic nature but it clearly is not. If it were, suicide would be impossible, yet many people kill themselves. Pursuing happiness is the basic nature so when the brain calculates life is not worth living it will commit suicide.

‘Most people at times think that life is not worth living but they don’t commit suicide.’

That’s because they haven’t calculated it at all, they are just feeling depressed but when all the pros and the cons go on the balance scale fear, which results from life’s experiences, weighs heavily on the side of not committing suicide. Apply enough pain to the other side and at the point where it tips, suicide results.

Fear keeps poor people on the treadmill of life, driving them while they create the wealth that only a minority, which doesn’t include themselves, enjoy, fear keeps them from ending their lives, which are not worth living.

Has Almighty God Created a system of abject misery for the majority so that a few can be happy? It certainly looks that way doesn’t it? But God is ‘infinitely loving fair and merciful’, that being the case He can’t have done, something is wrong. Doesn’t the Messianic Law insist that everyone must be happy?

Who cares what God wants? Certainly not me – not the MESSIAH and if I don’t care, why should the rich people?

I am a Human Being, a robot with only five senses to help me achieve what my programming demands. God exists outside of those five senses, it is therefore not possible for me to know Him. Claiming to love a Being that I cannot know is an exercise in self-delusion.

Do you see what I am trying to do? I am trying to help you understand the Creation, God’s Creation, for what it is and not what Religious Institutionism have convinced most of us and themselves that it is, a Creation of their emotions.

There is no emotion in God’s plan, its foundations or its structure, there is no morality either, look all you like you will not find any, that which you find is all illusion of human creation. Those people who died in the World Trade Centre Twin Towers after the terrorist attack died for one reason only – because they were there and all the attempts to understand, to justify, to explain, to condemn, to hope, to believe hasn’t brought a single one of them back. God knew that the attack would take place and what the response to it would be, why wouldn’t He when He is fully responsible for everything?

So if I, The Messiah, admit that the only one I care about is me (Trust me I love my children as much as anyone loves theirs but they are only thoughts in my head) I’m hardly going to accept that the Pope, or his clergy or the Mullahs or the Pastors or any of the self-appointed ‘Elect’ are any better than me, they too only care, ultimately, about themselves and it is because they do not understand this, because they never put the Messianic Law into the formulae of all their calculations that the answers to the ills of society that they come up with are always wrong. The social structure of the world therefore, and as you can see, is a shambles, attaining the purpose of Creation for the intelligent and the talented, the same people who have introduced the rules so that they can manipulate them for their own benefit

Intelligence and talent are God given gifts allocated to individuals for the benefit of the entire Human Race and not just the people whom He has used to convey knowledge and the benefits of talent, meaning; for intelligent and talented individuals only. That the social structure has evolved to suggest otherwise is evidence that there is a problem and though it is a problem which is difficult, under the circumstances, for the people holding all the aces to appreciate, they must, if they do all the calculations, be made to understand, that the pathetic inefficient and grossly unfair social system, which has inevitably evolved from the nature of the Human being, is a structure which must, in the not too distant future, collapse.

Let me give an example of paradox in my own life, the parallel of which you can no doubt find in your own, that evidences the problems inherent in our social structure:

When I was a fifteen year old boy, my parents, staunch Catholics, Working Class, eight children with an income of less than £10 a week to feed, clothe and house all ten of us, were members of the Conservative Party.

For those of you unfamiliar with the intrigues of the British political system the Conservative Party is the party of the rich and its philosophy is to do everything it can to make rich people richer and by doing so provide jobs for the Working Classes with the investments into which they put their money. Of course it’s a con but few people know it.

The paradox of my parents belonging to and voting for the Conservative Party was that they belonged to and voted for something that they clearly were not. Each of my parents lost a brother in the Second World War and then had their house stolen from them by a Conservative government compulsory purchase order, but they remained, until their dying days, oblivious to the deceit of the nation’s political system. Why, I asked myself when I was a boy, did they think they were Conservatives?

Religious Institutionism was the answer. Religious Institutionism, which causes most of the wars, which burnt at the stake, in the name of an infinitely loving and merciful God (I cannot say it too often), all who challenged them and hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, who didn’t even do that, was the answer.

The Catholic priest, God’s representative on earth, (His name was Joseph Walmsley) told my parents that the Labour Party was Socialist and Socialists were one step away from Communists who denied the existence of God. Socialists also advocated the policy of sharing power and wealth with the people who created it, namely the Working Class. Unfortunately, Religious Institutionism saw Communism as a threat to its existence, after all, if there is no God who needs religion?

Normally Religious Institutionism would have embraced Socialism for all they could milk out of it but when they realized that the Communists wanted to promote and pursue its policies without religion, which they (the Communists) understandably decided was part, and a very large part, of the world’s social problems, as it still is, Religious Institutionism got the fright of its life and as a result was forced to sup with the devil – Capitalism.

Religious Institutionism preaches justice for the masses; Religious Institutionism is inherently, according to its own teachings, Socialist. Why then did it encourage my parents generation to vote Conservative? Selfishness, Messianic Law, when Socialism threatened Religious Institutionism principles went out the door, Socialism with it, and in came Capitalism. The hypocrisy is mind numbing.

Selfishness is everywhere and I mean that quite literally, in the most well-meaning of leaders and their policies there is total selfishness. Religion, altruism, Capitalism, Communism, Democracy, Humanism you name it, are all different faces of the same Messianic Law.

Margaret Thatcher, (I live now in England so I use the history of this country and its day-to-day happenings to help explain philosophy) when as Prime Minister she had the power to do it, ‘generously’ gave ‘all’ of the British people the opportunity to benefit from the wealth of the nation by selling to them the shares of the nations Utility Companies – Water, Gas, Electricity, the Rail Network, the Coal Industry. It was deception and a criminal act of immeasurable and unforgivable proportions, firstly because the Companies were not hers nor her government’s to sell and secondly because she did nothing of the sort.

Margaret (‘The Criminal’) Thatcher didn’t sell the nation’s wealth which was created, maintained, sustained and fought for by generations of Working Class Britons to ‘all’ the British people as she clamed, she sold it to the ones who had the money to buy the shares, which totally excluded the Working Classes. It was deception of a magnitude that is immeasurable and for which there are no superlatives to describe what she did.

Not only that but she also destroyed the Trade Union Movement (what remains of the Trade Union Movement is illusion) which was an organization that evolved from the exploitation of the Working Classes at the hands of people to whose descendants Thatcher handed the shares of the Utility Companies and by so doing sent the Working Class people and all of their descendants – those not born with a talent - back into slavery. In this day and age with the wealth of North Sea Gas and years of British Colonial exploitation behind them, the ‘upper’ Classes in Britain have managed to convince the gullible - among the Working Classes - that they are free, because they all have a telly and enough to eat, but their freedom is an illusion.

Margaret Thatcher, through deception, persuaded Working Class people that the Trade Unions were the cause of all their problems, she did it partially by highlighting actual problems which evolved from the Trade Union leaders Messianic Law but she played every string on her fiddle.

‘The Unions are destroying this country with their wildcat strikes. They have too much power’ and there was an element of truth in it; wildcat strikes were causing irrevocable damage.

If you want a hole two metres by two metres by two metres deep digging in the United States of America by a man with a pick and shovel, it will cost you about $200, in Africa you can get a similar-sized hole with an equal amount of necessary effort dug for a dollar. Why is that? Supply and demand. No one in the States will dig a hole of that size for a dollar but in Africa there are millions who will.

Supply and demand works in the same way in whichever part of the world you may find yourself, it is a law of nature not a man made law. Why then the discrepancy between the price of digging a hole in Africa and the price in America? Because there isn’t enough paid work in Africa and a surplus of labour. The Africans are not stupid, they know they are being exploited but they also know if they don’t dig the hole for a dollar someone else will and the children of the one who refuses will starve. Awful isn’t it?

In 19th Century Great Britain, exploitation of the Working Classes was so bad – six-year-old children working in factories and in the coal mines 12 hour shifts for a shilling a week – that Trade Unionism evolved inevitably from the desperation. ‘It’s better to die than to continue working for these wages and in these conditions’ and the only power they had was the power of unity which afforded them the only hope they would ever have by collectively withdrawing labour. No use being the only one refusing to work if there are a line of fellahs around the corner willing to take your place.

Trade Unions one and only source of power was the withdrawal of labour both then when the Trade Unions formed and now wherever Trade Unionism operates in the world. Thatcher knew that, and she also knew that she had more than one gun in her arsenal with which to destroy British Trade Unionism. Divide and rule, now there’s a destructive force that worked well in the colonies. Divide the workers from their Trade Union leaders and Eureka – found the answer. And that’s what she did, divided the workers from their Union leaders by all the means at her disposal e.g. blaming them for ruining the economy by going on strike, blaming them for destroying industries and other businesses by going on strike, blaming them for shortages and disruption of services by going on strike which is what they did but that they did it as a last resort, having failed to dent the intransigence of the nations leaders and politicians on matters arising from the discrepancy in living conditions and wealth distribution between the workers and the shirkers was somehow glossed over.

Strikes were the only weapon the Workers had so she used another weapon, North Sea Gas, to show that their weapon was impotent. By doing this she called into question the Trade Union’s power to fight and protect its members. The Workers by this time all had colour televisions and some even had an electric toaster so she convinced them they had never had it so good (which sadly was true) and talked them into not spoiling it all by wasting their Trade Union subscriptions on an organization that was impotent and destroying the country to boot.

To this day many Working Class people sing the praises of Margaret Thatcher as though she was the Saviour of a doomed nation. When she destroyed the Mine Workers Union and with it the lives of men who had on a daily basis for generations risked their lives and health for the British people, Mrs. Thatcher said; ‘I am gloating, I am gloating.’

The truth of the matter is that Mrs. Margaret Thatcher was Britain’s and one of the entire world’s all-time greatest disasters. That she got away with her gross incompetence and criminal behaviour is down to what can only be described as two strokes of rarely-attained political good fortune.

The first of her lucky breaks was the coming on tap of North Sea Gas right at the beginning of her tenure of misrule. The North Sea Gas bonanza afforded her the opportunity to destroy the mining industry, the shipbuilding industry, the vehicle manufacturing industry to sell off the Utility Companies and the Rail network into the hands of ‘Shareholders’ many of them foreigners almost none of them Working Class all of whom have no interest whatsoever in the social structure that the companies represent and every interest in the financial profit they accumulate.

The profit from North Sea Gas masked the fact that she had destroyed at least a hundred years of infrastructure, technology and technique that was handed down from generation to generation because the book on economics that she read told her that ‘The purpose of business is profit.’ Had the same woman used the profit of North Sea Gas to improve the above mentioned industries instead of destroying them, Great Britain would be now right up there with the United States as a world Super Power.

Being the Iron Lady that in her head she was, Thatcher, as was her wont, swept aside all and every objection to her madness. She was a woman of black and white there were no grays. White minority rule in Zimbabwe was wrong therefore black majority rule was the solution. Communism didn’t work in the Soviet Union therefore the solution was Capitalism and no one could tell her that she was guilty of over simplification.

The second stroke of good fortune for Thatcher was the Falkland’s War which afforded the relatively gigantic military nation of Great Britain the opportunity to (using the terminology of an American president) kick ass.

It is a terrible indictment to 20 th century ‘civilization’ that one nation can go to war with another nation then stick its chest out in a spirit of ‘We showed em’ when they have just killed some of their own and the other country’s soldiers who were just doing their jobs. Margaret Thatcher was the main and perhaps the only beneficiary of that war, riding, ever since, the wave of national euphoria that resulted. It is the same kind of emotionalism from which political leaders often benefit when the country’s national team wins a football match, the only difference being that with a football match nobody loses a son, a brother, a father, or a husband.

The Falkland Islands did not belong to Argentina but nor did they belong to Great Britain, neither have title deeds from Almighty God, nevertheless they fought over it, not for reasons of righteousness but for reasons of presumption. Both thought they had the right to own it, the Argentineans further thought that if they sent soldiers to invade and take it they could do so with impunity … thoughts in the head, they were wrong. Had it been the Russians who invaded, Mrs. Thatcher would have backed down because the thoughts in her head would have been different. Do you see how the World is run by the Messianic Law?

The tide only turned on Mrs. Thatcher’s misrule when her own ministers realized that the ride on her Gravy Train wasn’t worth the price that Great Britain and the world was having to pay for it. She was followed into office by John Major who gave a female member of parliament named Edwina Curry a junior minister’s job in exchange for sexual favours. Ms. Curry, after having caused havoc for the nations agricultural community by claiming that all of their eggs had salmonella, went on to write a book that was clearly no more than an attention-seeking device aimed at boasting to the world that she had shagged a British serving Prime Minister and cared not a jot for the pain it inflicted on his wife and children nor the pain of her own husband and family, all she cared about was her moment of fame.

And of course John Major is not the only one in high office to have his judgment - judgment that affected the lives of millions of people - impaired by his testicles. John Prescott, the Deputy to Prime Minister Tony Blair, had an illicit affair with his secretary so did Robin Cook, one of Blair’s senior ministers and Paddy (‘Pantsdown’) Ashdown, erstwhile leader of the Liberal Democrat Party was caught in flagrant forniculation of his divine office. And who can forget the goings on with the Kennedy brothers across the pond or the blatant lie to the American people and the world, of Bill Clinton? ‘I did not have sex with that woman.’

This is not an attempt to dig dirt and throw it over the reputation of world leaders for the sake of the enjoyment we get out of it when watching them squirm, it is an exercise in reality to emphasize that people are never what they purport to be.

The Messianic Law tacitly states that people cannot tell the truth unless and until the brain calculates that it is in its interest to do so – the human being says, always, what s/he wants people to hear which is usually the truth but only because experience has taught (programmed) him/her to believe that lies will ultimately bring unhappiness.

I am using the examples of the political leaders mentioned above because they are the ones everybody knows about and to highlight the hypocrisy in man, even those in highest Office. Hypocrisy permeates everything, is everywhere and in all human beings. Everybody knows who these men are and they were not the only ones, they were simply the ones with opportunity, the ones caught when they didn’t expect to be, such high profile figures whose behaviour ‘shocked’ the world – and the band played on.

Were you shocked? Perhaps you were jealous. Some people have all the luck so when the less lucky are presented with the opportunity to humiliate them, or watching others in the ‘gutter press' humiliate and destroy their marriages and families we revel in their misfortune. Amazing isn’t it, how we humans get pleasure from the misfortune of others, we are all hypocrites including the clergy – especially the clergy. No?

You’ve heard of the Catholic priests who sexually abused small children? ‘They were just a tiny minority of bad eggs who have brought shame on a Church that doesn’t deserve it. Most priests are salt of the earth men as good or even better than the Church would have us believe they are’

Not true, and I say that because I know it to be a fact from personal experience. I was myself abused by a Catholic priest when I was a boy and I know many others (now men) who were abused by the same priest. I’ll even name him, he was Reverend Leo Sharratt, the Rector of the Junior Seminary I attended as a boy in 1959. He is not the only priest I know or knew personally, and I am not condemning the entire Church for the misbehaviour of a few errant priests, but I do condemn them, because all of the boys in that seminary knew, most of them having been victims, about Sharratt’s behaviour, we used to talk about it among ourselves, and if we all knew, for sure, the entire Seminary faculty of priests knew, the diocesan bishop knew and all the priests in the diocese knew. The grapevine being what it is, there is no way I can believe that everybody who should have known, didn’t.

In those days people kept shtoom about such matters, I even remember my own mother refusing to allow my brother – an altar boy – to accompany a visiting priest from the same seminary (I’ll name him also, his name was Moverley), on his rounds when visiting the village sick. My mother, acting out of character by refusing the request of a Catholic priest, explained her reason thus: ‘You know, these priests have no wives, the devil torments them all the time so we have to be careful and not judge them.’ At the time I had no idea what she was talking about.

How do you know that most priests pastors and other ‘Holy men’ are decent men deserving respect? Because they say they are? We must believe they are until they are caught being otherwise, what about believing that they aren’t until they prove otherwise?

I have known priests, preachers, pastors and clerics of many persuasions in my time, I even lived for a year with Irish Christian Brothers (infamous for having sexually abused orphan boys in their care) when I was a teacher at their Secondary School in Zambia from 1969 to 1970 and I don’t mind admitting that they, for the most part, were hard working men doing their best to build a world fit to live in, but I never met a saint among them nor a cleric that wasn’t in some way flawed. If you don’t know what I mean, introduce the holiest cleric you know to the Messianic Law and use it to imply that their entire life’s ‘sacrifice’ is nothing but their selfish means to an end then sit back and watch him blow a gasket.

I knew Irish Christian Brothers who, if you met them at church on a Sunday morning, you would believe were saints, yet the same men in the classroom on a Monday morning turned, as though by metamorphosis, into tyrants who thought nothing of battering small boys for the slightest infringement of the rules.

The purpose of the above information is to show that the social structure of the 21 st Century’s so-called civilization has developed and evolved from the flawed selfish minds of people like the above mentioned and this is the main reason for the gross inefficiency and the sickening hypocritical discrepancy in a system which pretends to be fair and gets away with the pretense because the leaders, including the spiritual ones, have vested interest in maintaining the status quo.

The first step to the solution therefore is to recognise this fact and then to rid ourselves of these leaders. Professional politicians per se should not be allowed within a light year of leadership positions and while I’m at it I might as well say that contemporary law court judges should not be allowed within a light year of the courts since not a single one of them speaks out against the injustice of the monetary legal system which is inherently unjust. Monetary justice is a contradiction in terms yet monetary justice, where the person who can afford the best lawyer inevitably wins is the order of the day and it is anathema.